Strings Cut: How Ottawa Walked Back the Clean Electricity Credit Conditions
The Clean Electricity ITC, a 15 percent refundable federal credit projected to support roughly $500 billion of investment by 2035, became law with Bill C-15's royal assent on March 26, 2026. The two conditions originally attached to provincial Crown-corp eligibility (a public net-zero electricity grid commitment by 2035 and a binding ratepayer pass-through with annual reporting) were stripped out in Budget 2025. The federal credit, as enacted, flows to provincial utilities with no climate test and no consumer-side accountability. The likeliest reason the change has drawn so little political attention is that almost everyone affected (Ottawa, provincial premiers, Crown utility CEOs) gets a cleaner outcome from the removal than they did from the gate. The cost is borne by the policy ambition the original conditions were supposed to advance, which is not a constituency that votes.
Subscribe
The next issue, in your inbox.
One Canadian business story dissected each issue. Free, no paywall.
FreeUnsubscribe anytimeEdited by The Editors
The Four Percent Lever: The IMF Estimate and Canada's Internal Trade Gap
The IMF's 2019 working paper estimates removing interprovincial trade barriers would add roughly four percent to Canadian GDP, with a full range of three to seven percent. The math has not changed across decades; the politics have not changed either. Each barrier protects a constituency that votes provincially, while the benefits of removal accrue diffusely. The Trump tariff moment is the first external shock in a generation that might shift that calculation, but only if Ottawa is willing to spend political capital it has been unwilling to spend before.
The Tariff Bill, Itemized: What the April Labour Force Survey Tells You
The April Labour Force Survey is the first print in which tariff pass-through should be visible in payrolls rather than only in corporate guidance. The composition matters more than the headline: manufacturing job loss confirms direct exposure to tariffs and CUSMA uncertainty, construction softness confirms rate-driven secondary drag, services resilience tells you the consumer is still spending, and youth unemployment elevated relative to adult is the structural risk that compounds quietly. The Bank of Canada's June 4, 2026 decision turns on whether the labour market is loosening fast enough to offset tariff-driven price pressure. The May LFS, released June 5, is the swing variable.
The $25 Billion Bet: What the Canada Strong Fund Actually Is (and Isn't)
The Canada Strong Fund is not Norway's sovereign wealth fund. Norway's fund is a savings vehicle that invests outside the country to preserve oil wealth. Canada's fund is a deployment vehicle directing capital into domestic infrastructure. The governance gap is the key variable: without a fiscal withdrawal rule and an independent results framework, the difference between a durable institution and a political slush fund is a legislation question, not an economics question.
Checkpoint or Cliff? The Real Cost of a CUSMA Failure
A failure to extend CUSMA on July 1 does not end the agreement overnight, but it triggers a decade of annual-review uncertainty that changes the calculus on every cross-border investment decision. The automotive rules of origin question is the one most likely to move markets; any signal on an agreed regional value content threshold is the most important economic data point before July 1, 2026.